Friday, December 29, 2006
There are several SEO tips moreover tricks that assist in optimizing a site but one of those, the significance of which is from time to time underestimated is sitemaps. Sitemaps, as the name involve, are just a map of your site - i.e. on one particular page you illustrate the structure of your site, its segment, the links sandwiched between them, etc. Sitemaps make plot a course your site easier as well as having an updated sitemap on your site is good both meant for your users as well as for search engines. Sitemaps are an important way of declaration with search engines. At the same time as in robots.txt you tell search engines which parts of your site to keep out from indexing, in your site map you let know search engines someplace you'd like them to go.
Sitemaps are not an innovation. They have at all times been part of best Web design practices but with the implementation of sitemaps by search engines, now they turn out to be even more significant. However, it is essential to make amplification that if you are interested in sitemaps for the most part from a SEO point of view; you can't go on with the predictable sitemap only (though currently Yahoo! as well as MSN still keep to the standard html format). Such as, Google Sitemaps uses a particular (XML) format that is different from the run of the mill html sitemap meant for human visitors.
One may ask why two sitemaps are essential. The reply is obvious - one is for humans, the other is meant for spiders (for now mainly Googlebot but it is rational to expect that other crawlers will stick together the club shortly). In that family member it is necessary to make clear that having two sitemaps is not look upon as duplicate content. In 'Introduction to Sitemaps', Google unambiguously states that using a sitemap will never lead to punishment for your site.
Why Use a Sitemap
Using sitemaps has several benefits, not only easier direction-finding and better visibility by search engines. Sitemaps offer the chance to inform search engines without delay about any changes on your site. Obviously, you cannot be expecting that search engines will hurry right away to index your misrepresented pages but without doubt the changes will be indexed faster, measure up to to when you don't have a sitemap.
Also, when you have a sitemap in addition to put forward it to the search engines, you rely less on peripheral links that will bring search engines toward your site. Sitemaps can even assist with confused internal links - such as if you by accident have broken internal links otherwise orphaned pages that cannot be accomplish in other way (though there is undoubtedly that it is a good deal better to fix your errors than rely on a sitemap).
Sitemaps are not an innovation. They have at all times been part of best Web design practices but with the implementation of sitemaps by search engines, now they turn out to be even more significant. However, it is essential to make amplification that if you are interested in sitemaps for the most part from a SEO point of view; you can't go on with the predictable sitemap only (though currently Yahoo! as well as MSN still keep to the standard html format). Such as, Google Sitemaps uses a particular (XML) format that is different from the run of the mill html sitemap meant for human visitors.
One may ask why two sitemaps are essential. The reply is obvious - one is for humans, the other is meant for spiders (for now mainly Googlebot but it is rational to expect that other crawlers will stick together the club shortly). In that family member it is necessary to make clear that having two sitemaps is not look upon as duplicate content. In 'Introduction to Sitemaps', Google unambiguously states that using a sitemap will never lead to punishment for your site.
Why Use a Sitemap
Using sitemaps has several benefits, not only easier direction-finding and better visibility by search engines. Sitemaps offer the chance to inform search engines without delay about any changes on your site. Obviously, you cannot be expecting that search engines will hurry right away to index your misrepresented pages but without doubt the changes will be indexed faster, measure up to to when you don't have a sitemap.
Also, when you have a sitemap in addition to put forward it to the search engines, you rely less on peripheral links that will bring search engines toward your site. Sitemaps can even assist with confused internal links - such as if you by accident have broken internal links otherwise orphaned pages that cannot be accomplish in other way (though there is undoubtedly that it is a good deal better to fix your errors than rely on a sitemap).
Monday, December 25, 2006
The world of search engines is varying at a fast rate... what we saw in the earlier period few months was consolidation of numerous search engines... most important players like Yahoo get your hands on the smaller ones with a view to get better their own search engine technology as well as capture more of the market share.
A year back we had Yahoo by means of Google's results, at the same time as Inktomi was the provider for MSN. Google as well had AOL using its results. Search engines like Overture used Inktomi as their liberated results provider. Lycos used results make available by FAST, as well as Altavista had its own engine.
The initial phase of consolidation started with Altavista as well as Alltheweb being bought over by Overture. At this moment Overture seemed to be in a very overriding position, being the market person in charge in Pay per click advertising as well as just having bought over 2 most important natural search engine technology providers.
The scenario all of a sudden changed again, when Overture itself was bought over by Yahoo. By means of Overture, what Yahoo got was not solitary the worlds leading Pay per click engine but as well the search technology of Altavista as well as Alltheweb. And to add icing to the cake, Yahoo went to the lead and acquired Inktomi.
This convoluted the picture from Microsoft's perspective. With Microsoft's have possession of search engine technology still in the development phase along with not yet ready for rollout, it was still completely dependent relative on Inktomi to provide results on MSN... as well as Inktomi now be in the right place to MSN's major rival Yahoo.
To top it all... even Overture, MSN's partner for sponsored results was now owned by Yahoo.
So at present what is the scenario?
We have Google provided that results on google.com as well as AOL. Yahoo using its own search technology, which seems to be a combination of Inktomi, FAST and Altavista as well as MSN still by means of Inktomi's database.
This is in sharp dissimilarity to the recent past when Google hand round about 2/3rd of the market (being the search engine technology contributor to Yahoo) as well as Inktomi had only 1/3rd (MSN's contribute to) of the search engine market.
A year back we had Yahoo by means of Google's results, at the same time as Inktomi was the provider for MSN. Google as well had AOL using its results. Search engines like Overture used Inktomi as their liberated results provider. Lycos used results make available by FAST, as well as Altavista had its own engine.
The initial phase of consolidation started with Altavista as well as Alltheweb being bought over by Overture. At this moment Overture seemed to be in a very overriding position, being the market person in charge in Pay per click advertising as well as just having bought over 2 most important natural search engine technology providers.
The scenario all of a sudden changed again, when Overture itself was bought over by Yahoo. By means of Overture, what Yahoo got was not solitary the worlds leading Pay per click engine but as well the search technology of Altavista as well as Alltheweb. And to add icing to the cake, Yahoo went to the lead and acquired Inktomi.
This convoluted the picture from Microsoft's perspective. With Microsoft's have possession of search engine technology still in the development phase along with not yet ready for rollout, it was still completely dependent relative on Inktomi to provide results on MSN... as well as Inktomi now be in the right place to MSN's major rival Yahoo.
To top it all... even Overture, MSN's partner for sponsored results was now owned by Yahoo.
So at present what is the scenario?
We have Google provided that results on google.com as well as AOL. Yahoo using its own search technology, which seems to be a combination of Inktomi, FAST and Altavista as well as MSN still by means of Inktomi's database.
This is in sharp dissimilarity to the recent past when Google hand round about 2/3rd of the market (being the search engine technology contributor to Yahoo) as well as Inktomi had only 1/3rd (MSN's contribute to) of the search engine market.